W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Is LDP going to use the MS-Author-Via header?

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:31:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhL=rn6U29d8EVcQmfcFjZvof8mGFAqxv193JkuS90EUXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
On 12 June 2013 22:28, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ReadWriteLinkedData.html
>>
>> "most WebDAV servers in 200X provided that header. It was natural
>> therefore natural to use the same header to adverize the availablity of
>> SPARQL. Perhaps the MS stands for "modification service"
>>
>>  I haven't heard of anyone suggesting we use it nor have I heard of
> anyone defining a scenario where I could see a need.  Perhaps this
> recommended usage is dated.  I think LDP shouldn't reuse or advocate it.
>
> I have implemented WebDAV in the past and never used this, though
> Frontpage wasn't a client interface I needed to worry about.
>

Thanks for getting back.

A number of projects have historically used this header for read / write
storage, including tabulator and data.fm.

The values we currently work with are DAV (for WebDAV based servers
normally using verbs such as GET, PUT, DELETE to read and write), and
SPARQL for use with things like SPARQL Update.

Looking forward to hopefully adding LDP implementations to the read / write
mix :)


>
> - Steve Speicher
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 20:32:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:35 UTC