- From: Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 03:24:24 -0500
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
https://github.com/madrobby/downtime is a "Standardized JSON API to indicate downtime for apps and services". Possible Use Case: Through which URLs could/would/should downtime JSON integrate with Problem JSON? -- Wes Turner On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Wes Turner <wes.turner@gmail.com> wrote: >> you can only have one of these two ;-) > > :0) > > I think that it seems more difficult to do in RDF/XML than in Turtle. > > As an exercise, I created a (very rough) Turtle approximation of the > HTTP Problem JSON: > > https://gist.github.com/westurner/5704379 > > It may or may not be useful here. > > This also looked helpful: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3669407/convert-xsd-to-rdf-schema > > -- > Wes Turner > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: >> hello wes. >> >> >> On 2013-06-03 15:10 , Wes Turner wrote: >>> >>> application/api-problem+turtle may be a good solution. >>> text/turtle is the mimetype for Turtle RDF Syntax. >> >> >> you can only have one of these two ;-) my proposal was based on the >> convention of most web standards nowadays to mint media types. the second >> one is based on the point kingsley made that in RDF, this often is pushed >> into the generic RDF media types. >> >> if you want to go this route (regardless of the media type), then you'll >> have to come up with a mapping of the currently JSON-based model into >> RDF-land. currently, JSON is the canonical model, and the XML syntax is >> derived from it. notice that this took a bit of negotiating, because JSON is >> more permissive than XML in its name syntax, so we restricted the names in >> potential extensions so that they don't cause trouble in the XML syntax. >> it's currently just a "should" in >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-problem-04#section-4, but >> at least we have made an effort and documented the reason. >> >> my guess is that mapping the problem model into RDF also requires a little >> bit of tweaking to accommodate for its roots in JSON, and to make the >> extension model reasonable. i am not 100% sure how to best do this, but i am >> pretty sure to get to good results it takes some handwork instead of just >> mechanically mapping JSON structures. >> >> cheers, >> >> dret.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 08:24:51 UTC