Note on PROV-AQ about LDP

Hi,

While reading the PROV-AQ I came across this note [1] about LDP spec.

[[
A provenance description at a dereferencable provenance-URI may be treated
as a bundle, and this is a good way to make provenance easily accessible.
But there are other possible implementations of a bundle, such as a named
graph in an RDF dataset, for which the bundle URI may not be directly
dereferencable.

***When a bundle is published as part of an RDF Dataset, to access it would
require accessing the RDF Dataset and then extracting the identified graph
component***; this in turn would require knowing a URI or some other way to
retrieve the RDF dataset. This specification does not describe a specific
mechanism for extracting components from a document containing multiple
graphs.

The W3C Linked Data Platform group (www.w3.org/2012/ldp/) is chartered to
produce a W3C Recommendation for HTTP-based (RESTful) application
integration patterns using read/write Linked Data; we anticipate that they
may address access to RDF Datasets in due course.
]]

IHMO, this sounds more like SPARQL GSP than LDP. WDYT ?

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] -
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-prov-aq-20130312/#accessing-provenance-records