- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:23:03 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 22:11 +0100, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On 29/03/12 21:51, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 21:35 +0100, Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> On 29/03/12 21:25, Sandro Hawke wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:16 -0700, ashok malhotra wrote: > >>>> On 3/29/2012 6:15 AM, David Wood wrote: > >>>>> I suggest that the Callimachus REST API be an input document to the LDP WG. > >>>> That would be great! > >>> > >>> Okay, since that's seconded, I've added a references section. I also > >>> took out the explicit mention of GET and PUT. > >> > >> The phrasing in the introduction: > >> > >> [[[ > >> This approach has been proposed and explored for some time [1][2][3][4], > >> but its use has only recently been reported in industry [5] [6]. > >> ]]] > >> > >> makes it sound like 1-4 have not been used in industry. In fact a number > >> of commercial organizations are using the Linked Data API [4], including > >> in media and financial sectors as well as for-profit organizations > >> serving the public sector. > > > > I did it that way because I was using the LDAPI as evidence that the > > approach had been "explored" (and generally to mention it). I didn't > > think it was fair to claim that LDAPI demonstrated reading and writing > > RDF through a RESTful API, since (as I recall), clients see JSON not > > RDF. But please correct me, if I've got that wrong. > > No, clients see RDF (in both RDF/XML and Turtle formats). > > It is true that they can *also* ask for the RDF to be translated to, and > returned as, simple JSON/simple XML/CSV/etc. > > The RESTful API machinery for paging, filters, views, text search etc > all apply independent of whether you ask for RDF or JSON. The modelling > of collections is all in RDF and returned in the RDF. All of the > metadata which allows you to discover alternative views and API > capabilities are expressed and returned in RDF. > > It *is* true that the current spec only defines read usage, not writing. > [Though it is quite straightforward to extend the list endpoints to > support the standard REST approach to collections.] Thanks for clarifying - I didn't realize this, and it makes the LDAPI work even more relevant than I'd thought. I've updated the charter, in a kind of trivial way, removing any distinction among the references. -- Sandro
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 13:23:13 UTC