Re: Relevant for us: Reference Semantic Model?

Hi all,

The reference semantic model Michael is referring to is of a much higher 
level than what we are talking about doing in the LD WG. So I don't see 
any reason to make any reference to it in the charter.

Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To:     Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc:     public-ldp@w3.org, Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Date:   02/13/2012 01:44 AM
Subject:        Re: Relevant for us: Reference Semantic Model?



Arnaud is on this mailing list, too. I hope he can answer this...

Ivan

On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:40 , Michael Hausenblas wrote:

> 
> Ivan, All,
> 
> Stumbled upon IBM's 'Reference Semantic Model' [1] and now wondering if 
this is as well relevant for LDP?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
>                Michael
> 
> 
> [1] 
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iicdoc/v1r4m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.iic.doc%2Fmodel_man%2Frsm.html

> 
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf