- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:07:03 +0100
- To: public-ldp@w3.org
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Sunday 16. December 2012 14.53.09 mca wrote: > thanks for the jumping in here. my only complaint w/ your reply is that > you "described to me" how you would express this choice, but didn't show > me. i am serious, too. Fair point! I have one proposal (that needs elaboration, for sure), in the presentation I gave at the LAPIS workshop on ESWC: http://folk.uio.no/kjekje/2012/lapis2012.xhtml#%2831%29 To do this in practice, it would first look for the pattern </resource> void:inDataset ?dataset. If it finds that this doesn't match anything, it simply cannot tell whether a SPARQL endpoint is present. If ?dataset is a URI, it should GET that/those resource(s), then it would probably have a VoID description. In the merged graph of the resource description and the VoID description, it would look for a pattern </resource> void:inDataset [ void:sparqlEndpoint ?endpoint ] if it finds that it matches, then there is a SPARQL endpoint. Obviously, I should sit down and write the code, but alas, there is too little time in the world. :-/ I've set myself a deadline of February to code the server side things for this though. Kjetil
Received on Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:07:27 UTC