- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:49:34 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ldp@w3.org
RESTful++. It is cute, and the Web needs all the cuteness it can get. Regards, Dave On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:25, Sandro Hawke wrote: > In response to various comments, on and off list, I've made a variety of > small changes: > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter-history/diff-21-31.html > > The only substantive changes, I think, are: > > - linking to the recent Submission as a starting point for the work > - saying that we'll use standard HTTP, not define our own extensions. > > I'm getting some pushback on using the term "RESTful" at all. I guess > the recent TAG meeting brought up some of the differences between Roy > Fielding's idea of REST and the various ways to term is used and misused > today. If anyone would care to suggest alternative terminology or > voice support for terms currently in the charter, please do so soon. > > -- Sandro > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 16:50:09 UTC