Re: QUERY Verb Proposal

On 1/19/15 5:58 PM, ashok malhotra wrote:
>
> On 1/19/2015 5:45 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
>> What we need to find out is what issues one could come across 
>> deploying this
>> on one's own LDP server. There are many use cases I can have for this 
>> without
>> it needing to be widely deployed. For example due to CORS limitations 
>> I need
>> a CORS proxy anyway to get remote data resources, and my personal 
>> social web
>> server can then allow me to use QUERY/SEARCH on those remote 
>> resources via
>> my proxy server. Caching can also be done on the client in local storage
>> with JavaScript. So - unless there are some issues we have not 
>> considered -
>> local deployements could be built and the experience used to provide 
>> feedback
>> to the HTTP WG.
> Good thought!  The Oracle folks have considered deploying QUERY on Oracle
> servers.  So, if you did an OPTIONS it would tell you that QUERY was 
> supported
> and, in addition, what query syntaxes you could use.
>
> Kingsley could support it on his OpenLink servers.
>
> Ashok 

Yes, of course.

Implementations from Oracle and OpenLink will encourage others to join, 
pronto! Then we don't fall into the trap of prescribing a standard 
rather than trying to standardize usage patterns that are already in use.

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this