Hi all, I've drafted a REC for LDP (attached) and errata doc (attached).
I was about to send a pub req but thought I'd check with y'all about
the stuff I made up:

  SOTD custom paragraph, which says basically nothing:
    This <abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</abbr> Recommendation was published by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp">Linked Data Platform Working Group</a>.
    Discussions of this document are on <a rel="discussion" href="mailto:public-ldp-comments@w3.org">public-ldp-comments@w3.org</a> (<a href="mailto:public-ldp-comments-request@w3.org?subject=subscribe">subscribe</a>, <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-comments/">archives</a>).

  <p>Summary of notable changes from the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PR-ldp-20141216/">Proposed Recommendation</a>.</p>
    <li><a href="http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/ae4acedaf21b">Minor rewording about provided authentication</a> in <a href="#security">Security Considerations</a></li>
    <li><a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/859f98c26867">Added sentence</a> before example 3 in the <a href="#h-ldpc-informative">introduction to Linked Data Platform Containers</a></li>

All look fine?

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 22:12:20 UTC