Re: LDP WG Rechartering

Yes, I would like something stronger than a hint.
How about a bullet that says
  o Ability for a client to specify the size and content of pages.
where content could mean items 11 to 20 or, if the items are ordered, keys 100 to 110, etc.

On a different point, I was struck by the line "must provide paging-related hints" <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html#ldpp-client-advertise>
Clearly a hint is something that can be ignored.  So why the "must"?
All the best, Ashok

On 10/29/2014 10:07 AM, John Arwe wrote:
> Steve, IIRC Ashok was after something stronger than a "hint" ... hence 'specify'.
>
> At least in discussions, that was my sense ... and it tended to extend into use cases like "give me 11-20th &things from the container, sorted &thisway".  Like what almost any UI wants to do.
>
> IIRC Sandro suggested that we could re-use the current response assertions about sorting as inputs to deal with the "sorted &thisway" piece, which made sense to me.
>
> Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages <http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe>
> z/VM OpenStack Enablement and KVM
>