- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:09:29 +0200
- To: Serena Villata <serena.villata@inria.fr>
- Cc: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Jr Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 19 May 2014, at 17:53, Serena Villata <serena.villata@inria.fr> wrote: > Dear Ashok, all, > I have just few comments on the Note: > > - "ACG: An Access Control Graph describes which agents can have some mode of access to a resource, or collection of resources.": I would > substitute this sentence with "ACG: An Access Control Graph describes which features an agents has to satisfy to have some mode of access > to a resource, or collection of resources.". This is to avoid the misunderstanding that only specified lists of agents (or roles of the > agents) are considered while it is also possible to list the attributes of the agents whose access is granted. I see that this point > is mentioned as possible future outcome of an AC WG: "The WG will need to decide whether it also wants to define fine-grained access > control at an attribute level." To me attribute-level AC is more general than specifying AC lists of agents (as you do not always know the > URIs of all the agents that will try to access the resource and maybe they are allowed to). However, I understand that this is a tricky point, and > it is fine with me to leave it as a future option (as it is just a single page :-) ) for a dedicated WG. > > - "allowing friends of his to POST to a container, but not read the contents of the container": sounds a bit strange to me. Why the constraint that he cannot read the contents of the container? I was thinking of an notification LDPC where one can be notified of a change to a resource ( say someone adds you to their friend profile ). You want to allow people to POST but not necessarily to view all the notifications that have been posted. I updated the uses cases here https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/AccessControl does that help? > > All the best, > Serena > > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> >> À: "Ted Thibodeau Jr" <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, "Serena Villata" <serena.villata@inria.fr>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org >> Envoyé: Lundi 19 Mai 2014 16:57:31 >> Objet: Please review the Access Control page >> >> Serena, Ted: >> The LDP WG is getting ready to publish the Access Control page as a WG note. >> Could you please take a look at >> https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/AccessControl >> before we do that? And it is what it says -- just a single page :-) >> -- >> All the best, Ashok >> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 10:10:01 UTC