Re: A question on the definition of LDP-BC

hi Nandana, 

It's an interesting point. Especially the line you have highlighted: "allows members to be any resources, not only documents". I'm looking forward to getting some perspective on that - especially from the spec authors. 

regards, 
Roger



On 8 May 2014, at 11:36, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In the LDP spec, one form of a membership triple can be as following.
> 
> (membership-constant-URI, membership-predicate, member-derived-URI)
> 
> In this case, what we call the 'member-derived-URI' resource is the member, isn't it ? I am not sure the name of the 'membership-constant-URI' resource but it is not the member, I assume. 
> 
> The definition of the LDP-DC says, 
> An LDPC that adds the concept of membership, allowing the flexibility of choosing what form its membership triples take, and allows members to be any resources, not only documents.
> 
> LDP-DC allows membership-constant-URI to be any resource but the member-derived-URI (or member) will always be the created document. So I am not sure whether the latter part of the definition is correct but that depends on the answer to the first question. 
> 
> I assume the answer should be yes, because the definition of the LDP-IC says 
> An LDPC similar to a LDP-DC that is also capable of having members whose URIs are based on the content of its contained documents rather than the URIs assigned to those documents.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Nandana