Re: describedby

Hi Roger,

This is related to issue raised by Sergio which was discussed in the F2F,
isn't it ? For that one, the resolution was it was ok to have distinct
usages of describedBy header as long as they point to descriptions.

[1] - http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-04-15#resolution_4

Best Regards,
Nandana


On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Roger Menday
<roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>wrote:

>
> hello
>
> 4.2.1.6 says that constraints placed on clients when creating or updating
> must be advertised with the 'describedby' link header. However, section
> 4.2.4.3. describes a failed update scenario, but fails to state that the
> 'describedby' header must be used.
>
> Should it ?
>
> thanks,
> Roger
>