Re: LD Patch progress

Thanks for the update, Alexandre.

Although an FPWD doesn't commit the WG to anything, I don't think it's 
reasonable to expect people to read the spec over the weekend and be ready 
to approve its publication on Monday. I would plan on giving WG members at 
least a week to review it.

As for the spec repo, can't we just use mercurial like we have done so far 
for the other specs? I now we've decided to use github for the test suite 
but that's to facilitate download by people outside the WG. There is no 
such need for a spec.

Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


bertails@gmail.com wrote on 05/01/2014 01:56:34 PM:

> From: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> Cc: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, 
> Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
> Date: 05/01/2014 01:57 PM
> Subject: LD Patch progress
> Sent by: bertails@gmail.com
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just wanted to give some update to the group about LD Patch.
> Pierre-Antoine, Andrei and I have been meeting a few times since the
> F2F and we have settled on the exact scope for LD Patch, including the
> syntax and the operational semantics.
> 
> Our plan is to prepare a draft by the end of next week so that the
> group can decide on May 12th to publish the FPWD so that we can start
> gathering feedback.
> 
> Also, it would be nice if a team contact could create a ldpatch-spec
> repository under the w3c organization at GitHub. And then give us
> control. Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Alexandre
>