- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:52:09 -0700
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF16F44555.3B697E5C-ON88257D00.0056E614-88257D00.00572C60@us.ibm.com>
Hi Kingsley, I don't see how this helps with the problem at hand. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote on 06/23/2014 08:38:58 AM: > From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, > Date: 06/23/2014 08:39 AM > Subject: Re: How about "identifying URL" instead of "canonical" URL? > > On 6/23/14 11:19 AM, Cody Burleson wrote: > > > > How about "identifying" ? > > IRIs (be they HTTP URIs, HTTP URLs etc..) denote things. > Documents can Identify things when their content is comprised of > statements that describe things (basically connotation via description > statements that can be represented as an RDF statement based graph > pictorial). > > If we stick with terminology outlined in AWWW (Architecture of the World > Wide Web) and RDF specs, we'll negated these perennial issues with > terminology. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 15:52:44 UTC