- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:31:18 -0400
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 17:31:48 UTC
> MUST NOT is hard to test compliance to anyway. 1: I don't think it's any easier nor harder to test in this case than Should Not. It won't be automatable either way. 2: That's a distraction. Automated tests are desireable+helpful, not required. Sandro has a numbered rant for that, if you think back to March. 5.1.6 isn't automated-testable either, but it's still the right behavior and WE get to define the compliance criteria for LDP Paging clients. Ditto 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.4... so 2/3 of the existing client constraints are not easily testable using automation, by my count. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2014 17:31:48 UTC