Re: Comments on LDP-Paging - proposal on abandoning page sequences

> > > I'd propose we add a clause that says something of the sort:
> > > [[LDP Paging servers SHOULD indicate that they have abandoned a
> > > sequence by responding with at 410-Gone to any of the in-sequence
> > > pages with appropriate paging link response headers, rel='first']]

> > I'm agnostic at this point as to the value of SHOULD-410, since it
> > doesn't give clients any new guarantees.

> Well, it helps guide them in a closer direction (see above).  Which 
> I think still provides value, otherwise impls will just make up stuff.

Arnaud: we have a proposal, above, for Monday agenda.

As I said above, I'm agnostic on it. 
If we do add this, then (speaking as an editor) I would probably add the 
"successful" qualification to the existing clauses requiring links in 
response to GET aka 6.2.10-15 at the same time.


Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead