- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:36:13 -0400
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFEA815E87.BD557529-ON85257D23.006B811F-85257D23.006BB0A4@us.ibm.com>
WG: Please note specifically the addition of 5.1.6 , which arose AFTER today's meeting from a side discussion with Sandro, and yell if changes are needed for LC. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead ----- Forwarded by John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM on 07/28/2014 03:34 PM ----- From: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS To: "McFall, Gregory" <gregory.mcfall@pearson.com> Cc: public-ldp-comments@w3.org Date: 07/28/2014 02:48 PM Subject: Re: Client MUST advertise ability to support LDP Paging Greg, on today's working group call, the working group endorsed Sandro's initial response to change 6.2.17 to a SHOULD NOT, for the reasons he articulated at [3]. At the end of [3], the final sentence "Unfortunately..." said that we can't say much about those clients that treat 303 as 307/308, but I think otherwise, conferred with Sandro, and he changed his mind. I just made updates to the editor's draft at [1], changeset [2] to clarify that. They net out to: 5.1.6 = new MUST NOT on clients (outlawing the conflation of 303 with 307/308), which is NOT specifically approved by the working group yet ... they might prefer Should Not; I could live with either personally. 6.2.17 = changed (Must > Should as you requested, plus edits in non-normative note) If this addresses your comment to your satisfaction, or not, please respond to that effect on the list. In the "or not" case, if you have any specific changes that would satisfy you by all means supply them as input. The working group will be reviewing in parallel as well, so it is possible that this will still evolve; in the case of substantive change, we'll have to ask you to take another look, but that seems unlikely in the case of 6.2.17; 5.1.6 is less certain simply because fewer eyes/brains have already seen it. If you have any reactions that one or the other on its own is sufficient from your point of view, that's also useful feedback. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/80eceaffcba5 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-comments/2014Jul/0002.html Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 19:37:50 UTC