Re: paging namespace

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>  On 07/08/2014 04:24 PM, John Arwe wrote:
>
> We have resolved at some point to use the same namespace for terms defined
> by LDP paging as we used for LDP, right?
> And to use a single vocabulary document for both, rather than adding a
> second wafer-thin one?
>
> Well I know we didn't resolve to create a different one.  I looked at this
when I split out the paging stuff originally and only created a separate
vocabulary document to hold the paging-specific stuff while the core LDP
spec matured independently.

>
> I don't know if we have a resolution for this, but I strongly favor one
> namespace.
>
For me, the resolution was to take the paging stuff "as is" and move to
another document.  Therefore the namespace is the same and since our WG
owns the namespace, we can control what else gets added.

I too favor one namespace.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
http://stevespeicher.me



>
>
>        -- Sandro
>
>  Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
> <http://w3.ibm.com/jct03019wt/bluepages/simpleSearch.wss?searchBy=Internet+address&location=All+locations&searchFor=johnarwe>
> Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
>
>
>