- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:27:40 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "Kingsley (Uyi) Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
On 01/24/2014 10:07 AM, Henry Story wrote: > > On 24 Jan 2014, at 15:55, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > >> On 01/24/2014 09:15 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> On 1/24/14 3:11 AM, Henry Story wrote: >>>>> Somewhere inhttp://www.w3.org/ns/ldp.html, at the fragment-id >>>>>> #Container, I expect to find something saying that ldp:Container when >>>>>> used with rel=profile denotes the Container interaction model as >>>>>> defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id. >>>> You can not do things like that in RDF. You can not have a URI >>>> denote one thing if it is related to by one relation, and another thing >>>> if it is related to by another relation. >>>> >>> Alexandre, >>> >>> Wouldn't you be better served by providing an example of what you mean? >>> Like Henry, I don't understand what you mean i.e., how you would express >>> what you claim using RDF. >>> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container> a rdf:Class ; >> dc:description "when use with with rel=profile, denotes the Container interaction model as defined inhttp://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#the-right-id" . > > This suggests that with another relation ldp:Container denotes something else. Yet a URI always only > denotes one thing. That is core to the notion of a URI, and clearly written out in the ldp semantics. I still don't understand. Can you say where it's "clearly written out"? In plain English: ldp:Container happens to be a class that can be used to denote the Container interaction model when used with rel=profile. What's wrong in that sentence? Alexandre. > > Henry > > >> >> Alexandre. > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 15:27:47 UTC