W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Getting to closure on the remaining issues

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:08:24 -0500
Message-ID: <52E13E78.4070009@w3.org>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Arnaud,

right after "ISSUE-89 - Managed Resources" and if it gets accepted,
I'd like to propose the following:

PROPOSED: remove all mention of non-member-properties and
non-containment resources from the spec.

If no immediate consensus, we leave it in the spec.

John and I discussed that in [1]. I believe that Prefer makes the
non-member-properties and non-containment resources unnecessary. This
PROPOSAL would simplify the spec. Also, if the mechanism happens to be
needed, it could be re-introduced in LDP Next.

Alexandre.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Jan/0098.html


On 01/22/2014 06:36 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you all know we've been slipping off track with regard to our schedule
> to deliver a Recommendation by the time our WG expires (1 June 2014). We
> cannot afford any further slippage. See the timeline I laid out:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.01.27#2nd_Last_Call_timeline
>
> What this means, practically, is that we no longer have time to
> investigate and debate issues at length. We HAVE to close every remaining
> issue one way or another. If we can't agree on a resolution then we will
> postpone the issue. Yes, that means we may have unresolved issues. Nothing
> is perfect.
>
> The good news is that while we still have several pending issues, I
> believe we can close them all quickly (yes, really). We've got proposals
> for all of them and it's "merely" a matter of getting these accepted.
>
> Of course this is only to get us to LC2 and there is no way to tell what
> will come out of it but that's beyond our control.
>
> In the agenda for next Monday I put forward a set of proposals on how to
> revolve every remaining issue:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.01.27
>
> Be prepared to cast a vote on every one of them or accept not to have a
> say. I will not further delay resolution on these.
>
> I know this has been trying for everyone and it's been hard for some to
> stay on top of everything. The thing is I don't think the world would fall
> apart no matter how any of these decisions would go. So, let's just decide
> one way or another and move on.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 16:08:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC