Re: rel=type or rel=profile

On 1/15/14 10:06 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> In short: the argument that rdf:type is problematic does not hold.
+1

rdf:type is only problematic if we aren't using RDF [1] at all. We are 
either using RDF or we aren't.


[1] http://bit.ly/1m5Ucgv -- Resource Description Framework (RDF).

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen