- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:54:58 -0600
- To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:55:49 UTC
Team, Putting forth first that I may have missed something or even a lot about the subject of PATCH, I feel like it's still a lingering issue that we haven't made enough progress on. Did I miss something? What I can see is that we have is a set of proposals/options, which are documented here: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDP_PATCH_Proposals ... and from what I understand, we were then supposed to put in a vote from amongst these options - else propose something else. Amongst the options, I favor Turtle Patch. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/TurtlePatch Even though it does not support blank nodes, they could be handled with skolemization, as the proposal suggests. I'm open to having my mind changed, but in the context of Linked Data for the WWW, I don't think we need to be even indirectly advocating the use of bnodes. I do not see any open issue regarding PATCH format. Did we somehow already close the loop on this? If not, I think we need an issue. -- Cody Burleson
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:55:49 UTC