- From: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:04:18 +0000
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7EA4F567-2EF8-4134-803A-B6392086E1F3@uk.fujitsu.com>
>>>>> If you have a graph that said >>>>> >>>>> <#joe> a :Elephant . >>>>> >>>>> This would tell you quite a lot about how you can interact with <#joe> . >>>> >>>> Ok, I'll bite. What exactly does the rdf:type statement tell *code* about how it can interact with <#joe>? >>> >>> Say you have a robot that can walk around, and that knows that <#joe> is an elephant, then it will know a lot of things >>> that are true of Elephants in general. IT will know that it has a trump, and that it walks around on 4 legs, that >>> if it is older it has a certain size, etc... It will know that it eats, that is has good memory usually, etc. Those >>> are all kinds of constraints on how the robot can interact with the elephant. For example it is quite different than how it >>> would interact with <#jimmy> a cricket. With an elephant the human sized robot might have a chance to meet it head on. >>> With a bacteria a cricket it might have to look in completely different places. >>> >> >> >> Like on the web, I think that the robot will be offered interaction possibilities in the form of <forms> and this is how it makes it's way around. > > :-D > > So you think children have an internal language of thought that resembles HTML somehow, and that when > they want to raise their hand they POST a form to the decision module in their head to raise their hand, > or something like that? Well, I think if you go into a RESTuarant, you are lead through through that experience ... you don't rely on some (possibly outdated) notions of what you should do and how to do them. Roger > I think that sounds very much like a philosophical confusion, due to using one tool too much, and > to a confusion about the syntax/semantics distinction. But you are not the only one with this > problem :-) Brian Cantwell Smith explains very well how computer scientists have had a lot of difficulties > with this distintion over the past 40 years, in the presentation at the PhiloWeb in the Pompidou Center > last year: > > http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyxk0l_brian-cantwell-smith-the-philosophy-of-computation-meaning-mechanism-mystery_tech > > Henry >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 12:04:47 UTC