- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:48:55 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52CC2FF7.1050503@openlinksw.com>
On 1/7/14 9:58 AM, John Arwe wrote: > > If you have a graph that said > > > > <#joe> a :Elephant . > > > > This would tell you quite a lot about how you can interact with <#joe> . > > Ok, I'll bite. What exactly does the rdf:type statement tell *code* > about how it can interact with <#joe>? That the entity denoted by the identifier <#joe> is the subject of a relation that has :Elephant as its object i.e., that there is an association between the referent of <#joe> and :Elephant facilitated by the relation denoted by rdf:type. In addition to the above, since the meaning of the rdf:type is clearly defined, it also implies that the referent of <#joe> is an instance of :Elephant. The meaning of the relation has bearing on the shape and form of interactions. [1] http:// bit.ly/18UWaKJ -- Linked Data (using HTTP URIs to make terms that resolve to descriptors or description documents) [2] http://bit.ly/1jlHsq9 -- RDF Relation Semantics Illustrated [3] http://bit.ly/JVkgP8 -- My Glossary of Terms. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 16:49:17 UTC