- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:14:57 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 15:15:31 UTC
>> I have a hard time believing we can just stuff a bunch of extra triples >> into what (under 5 as written, given your reply to my clarifying question) >> becomes the only LDP-defined way to avoid the (possibly numerous) >> membership triples without knocking over someone's apple cart. > I'm not sure to understand that last comment. Can you clarify? Restated: If I assume that we double the number of triples (proposal 3), then proposal 5 (as written, which *replaces* what-is rather than adding to it) is likely to cause -1s. Given that you have subsequently stated that you're open to adding instead of replacing, "events have overtaken" that observation. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 15:15:31 UTC