public-ldp-wg@w3.org from February 2014 by date

Friday, 28 February 2014

• Regrets for Monday Cody Burleson
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• LDP agenda for 3 March 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: LDP with JSON-LD ... and it looks good ! Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army Sandro Hawke
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army Roger Menday
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army Sandro Hawke
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer - volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• LDP with JSON-LD … and it looks good ! Roger Menday
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer Sandro Hawke
• Re: LDPR vs LDPC interaction models Sergio Fernández
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer henry.story@bblfish.net

Thursday, 27 February 2014

• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer Steve Speicher

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

• Re: volunteering for the army Roger Menday

Tuesday, 25 February 2014

• Re: future work item: real solution to issue-15 (metadata on non-RDF resources) Steve Speicher
• Re: class hierarchy of containers henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: LDPR vs LDPC interaction models Steve Speicher
• Re: class hierarchy of containers Arnaud Le Hors
• future work item: real solution to issue-15 (metadata on non-RDF resources) Sandro Hawke
• Re: volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: volunteering for the army Roger Menday
• Re: volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: class hierarchy of containers henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: class hierarchy of containers Arnaud Le Hors
• LDP Minutes for 24 February Arnaud Le Hors

Monday, 24 February 2014

• Re: class hierarchy of containers Kingsley Idehen
• class hierarchy of containers henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: non-IRs, was Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• RE: LDP agenda for 24 February Steve Battle
• non-IRs, was Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Sandro Hawke
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Kingsley Idehen
• Re: TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer Steve Speicher
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Steve Speicher
• Fixing (removing) clause 6.3.1 on LDPC GET needs Steve Speicher

Sunday, 23 February 2014

• TWO PROPOSALs involving Prefer Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposal for refactoring Containers Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposal for refactoring Containers Ashok Malhotra
• proposal for refactoring Containers Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 22 February 2014

• Re: lossless paging & volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: lossless paging & volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: LDP agenda for 24 February Sandro Hawke
• draft of 209 RFC Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 21 February 2014

• Re: LDP agenda for 24 February Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: LDP agenda for 24 February Ashok Malhotra
• Re: LDP agenda for 24 February Sandro Hawke
• LDP agenda for 24 February Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• Re: lossless paging & volunteering for the army henry.story@bblfish.net
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• LDPR vs LDPC interaction models Sergio Fernández
• Re: Sandro's various issues (was Re: A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership?) Arnaud Le Hors
• Sandro's various issues (was Re: A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership?) Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 20 February 2014

• Changed rule for LDPC PUT to be about containment triples Steve Speicher
• Removed should not use patch to create rule Steve Speicher
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Steve Speicher
• Re: A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership? Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Steve Speicher
• Re: A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Steve Speicher
• Re: A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership? Arnaud Le Hors
• A simpler way of thinking about containment and membership? Sandro Hawke
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Kingsley Idehen

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Sandro Hawke
• PATCH vs PUT Sandro Hawke
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Kingsley Idehen
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Steve Speicher
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Sandro Hawke
• Re: lossless paging using HATEOAS Sandro Hawke
• Re: lossless paging using HATEOAS Steve Speicher
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Steve Speicher
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Steve Speicher
• Re: clarifying containment vs membership Sandro Hawke
• clarifying containment vs membership Sandro Hawke
• lossless paging using HATEOAS Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

• Completed split of paging from LDP spec Steve Speicher
• ldp-extensions, ldp-paging, and Re: some thoughts on ordering Sandro Hawke

Monday, 17 February 2014

• Re: some thoughts on ordering Ashok Malhotra
• LDP Minutes for 17 February Arnaud Le Hors
• Changes for latest names/terms accepted from today's meetings are live Steve Speicher
• some thoughts on ordering Sandro Hawke
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• Re: who wants lossy paging? Sandro Hawke
• Re: stable paging Sandro Hawke
• Re: stable paging John Arwe
• Re: Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Steve Speicher
• Re: who wants lossy paging? John Arwe

Sunday, 16 February 2014

• stable paging Sandro Hawke
• Re: who wants lossy paging? Ashok Malhotra
• who wants lossy paging? Sandro Hawke

Friday, 14 February 2014

• LDP agenda for 17 February Arnaud Le Hors
• Editors' proposal for types of containers Steve Speicher
• Editors' proposal for types of resources Steve Speicher
• overwhelmed by the Terminology section ? Roger Menday
• Re: Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Roger Menday
• Editors' proposal for membership predicate names Steve Speicher

Thursday, 13 February 2014

• Re: Question regarding involving another member on my team Arnaud Le Hors
• Question regarding involving another member on my team Cody Burleson
• Re: Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Andrei Sambra
• Re: A new HTTP response code say 209 Yves Lafon

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

• Re: Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Andrei Sambra
• Re: "document" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Ashok Malhotra
• Re: "document" Ashok Malhotra
• Re: "document" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LDP feedback ( LC-2812) John Arwe
• Re: "document" John Arwe
• Clarifying POST behavior for LDPCs. Andrei Sambra
• "document" Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Creating members John Arwe
• Re: Creating members John Arwe

Tuesday, 11 February 2014

• Re: Creating members Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Creating members Ashok Malhotra
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Cody Burleson
• normative change pushed John Arwe
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples David Wood
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples John Arwe
• Re: Creating members Arnaud Le Hors
• Creating members Ashok Malhotra

Monday, 10 February 2014

• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Cody Burleson
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Steve Speicher
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Cody Burleson
• Re: To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Steve Speicher
• To spec editors - regarding possibly redundant rdf:type definition of containers in examples Cody Burleson
• LDP Minutes for 10 February Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: A new HTTP response code say 209 Ashok Malhotra
• RE: LDP agenda for 10 February Steve Battle
• [23]xx status codes, prefer, and create John Arwe

Friday, 7 February 2014

• LDP agenda for 10 February Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 5 February 2014

• CFP: Second International Workshop on Linked Media Erik Mannens

Monday, 3 February 2014

• LDP minutes for February 3 Arnaud Le Hors

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2014 23:46:08 UTC