W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > August 2014

Re: ISSUE-100: Should ld-patch use a slash like sparql does, instead of as it currently does?

From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:46:28 +0200
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <87EF1FF6-1BB7-4DDF-9D2D-42D78BF0E43D@bblfish.net>
To: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>

On 18 Aug 2014, at 22:38, Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org> wrote:

>> 
>> Do you have a concrete example of where there are differences?
> 
> Bind ?foo ?x / :p1 / :p2 [ / :p3 / :p4 = "bar" ] / :p5 .
> 
> This will be denoted in SPARQL by the following:
> 
> ?x :p1/:p2 ?y .
> ?y :p3/:p4 "bar" .
> ?y :p5 ?foo .

I saw Alexandre come up with a lot of path expressions 
for a set of queries given to him by Sandro. Did anyone
then try to find an equivalent for each of these using
a small subset of SPARQL PATCH? With perhaps space for
comments on the types of issues discovered doing this?


I think that would be very helpful in getting an understanding
of the relative merits of the two solutions spaces.

Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 20:47:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:58 UTC