- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:52:45 +0100
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53E0A96D.4060801@openlinksw.com>
On 8/5/14 10:02 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: > On 4 Aug 2014, at 23:32, Ashok Malhotra<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > >> >Henry: >> >We decided to remove access control for attributes (parts of triples) >> >We did not discuss removing access control for triples. >> >We can discuss this if you wish. > I don't see how you can do access control on parts of triples at all. > > The argument as I understand it is that one can only give access or not > at the HTTP layer to a resource. What state of the resource you show > is another topic: call it filtering. That could be an orthogonal spec. > It is best to keep things simple and distinct to arrive at a consensus. > > Henry > +1 -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 09:53:08 UTC