Re: Fwd: draft HTTP 209 draft spec review

Just to point out (in case all the ‘draft’ stuff wasn’t clear!) this is a *draft* review at the moment, and shouldn’t be taken as the TAG’s opinion quite yet…

Jeni

------------------------------------------------------
From: ashok malhotra ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Reply: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Date: 5 April 2014 at 09:38:05
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Subject:  Fwd: draft HTTP 209 draft spec review

> FYI ...
>  
>  
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: draft HTTP 209 draft spec review
> Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:13:33 +0000
> Resent-From: www-tag@w3.org
> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 09:13:05 -0700
> From: Jeni Tennison  
> To: www-tag@w3.org
>  
>  
>  
> TAG members,
>  
> As discussed during our face-to-face this last week, I have put together a draft review  
> of the draft spec for the HTTP 209 status code, at:
>  
> https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/blob/master/2014/04/http-209.md
>  
> I’d appreciate a second pair of eyes before we officially forward this on to Eric Prudhommeaux  
> as a consensual TAG review.
>  
> Jeni
> --
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>  
>  
>  
>  

--  
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

Received on Monday, 7 April 2014 09:19:36 UTC