- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:30:08 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <533D5450.4060501@openlinksw.com>
On 4/3/14 7:53 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: > The WG could suggest to the RDF WG that a specification of relative graphs > and how it would fit with the abstract syntax would be very helpful in many > ways. I think Richard even acknowledged this would be good and useful. But > I don't see that this group needs to wait for that to happen. We don't need to take that route. Simply introduce "relative RDF graph" into the LDP glossary of terms. An implementer (with a strong RDF abstract syntax bent) with then be able to make more sense of many of the existing LDP examples. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:30:29 UTC