Re: Practical issues arising from the "null relative URIs"-hack

On 4/3/14 7:53 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> The WG could suggest to the RDF WG that a specification of relative graphs
> and how it would fit with the abstract syntax would be very helpful in many
> ways. I think Richard even acknowledged this would be good and useful. But
> I don't see that this group needs to wait for that to happen.

We don't need to take that route.

Simply introduce "relative RDF graph" into the LDP glossary of terms. An 
implementer (with a strong RDF abstract syntax bent) with then be able 
to make more sense of many of the existing LDP examples.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 12:30:29 UTC