- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:08:19 +0100
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 08:08:46 UTC
Apologies, I can't attend the telecon today as I am on-site with a customer. Just to let you know that the UC&R is now up-to-date with the main recommendations made by both Miguel and David Wood. All remaining informative references have been added using localbiblio definitions. I believe the UC&R is now ready for release. David commented on a seeming disconnect between the UC&R and the main specification. I see this as a positive because we have developed a conceptual framework in UC&R that is faithful to, and illuminating the user-stories, rather than simply being a reverse engineering of the spec. Despite this, the apparent differences are, I believe merely differences in emphasis rather than inconsistencies (e.g. Aggregation given equal weight as composition, lack of LDP vocabulary, less focus on container manipulation as use-cases as they are really a means to an end). Thanks again to Miguel and David for your support. Steve. On Saturday, September 28, 2013, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > Here: > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.09.30 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 08:08:46 UTC