- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:34:38 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 20:35:10 UTC
Eric, how does your proposal map ldp:pageOf (rule 4.10.2.4.3) and ldp:containerSortxxx (5.3.2-5.3.5) to headers? Despite your stated preference, it appears that pageOf could be addressed using rel=collection. Container sort criteria are far less obvious however, and was the sticky part when we discussed the proposal at the F2F. Those currently require the presence of a ldp:Page resource in the triples regardless of whether or not the particular resource supports paging. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 20:35:10 UTC