- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:16:28 -0700
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF78B44B67.862DD3EB-ON88257B3E.000057A9-88257B3E.000182EF@us.ibm.com>
Hi Ashok, I know what you mean! I've been struggling to keep up with the flood myself. The problem I have with either of these is that we don't have any concrete proposals. I don't think it is very effective to have discussions without a proposal. That's why I didn't put them on the agenda. For what it's worth the thread under Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions has turned into a discussion on mediatype, hypermedia, affordance, discovery, REST, etc. Nothing really precise. We already have issues 32 and 57 that are related to some of this with pending actions. I'd rather wait for the actions to be completed to dedicate airtime to this and progress on other issues in the meantime. Is that ok with you? Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, Date: 03/29/2013 04:21 PM Subject: Re: LDP Agenda for April 1st Hi Arnaud: Two LDP issues have flooded my inbox: - how to know that something was DELETEd - Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions Can we discuss these on Monday? All the best, Ashok On 3/29/2013 6:16 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: Hi all, Here is the agenda for Monday. I asked on our last call if there was any reasons we couldn't have our next call on April 1st. Nobody said anything. I've since then been reminded that this coming Monday is a major holiday in Europe and people might be off. I apologize for the inconvenience if that's the case. Please note that with the daylight saving time change taking place this weekend in Europe we should now all be back on our normal schedule (4pm Paris). The agenda is now available. I've listed several issues that were raised with a clear proposal on how to close them. I propose by default to close the issue following the proposal made by the submitter. I only mean this to give us a concrete starting point though and you should feel free to counter with a different proposal if you feel this isn't right. See: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.04.01 Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 00:29:48 UTC