- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:12:48 +0100
- To: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 06:13:20 UTC
On 7 Mar 2013, at 05:38, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > I agree that backlinking (linking from an LDPR to its LDPC) should be possible, ... > Henry, when you say "its LDPC", which (of the potentially many LDPCs that may list an LDPR as a member) one do you have in mind? > > I could read your statements to be very general, or to apply to a more restricted set of cases that is (to me at least) not fully articulated. > > I hear "its" to be singular, but that might also be other than what you intend. > I tend to think of an LDPR as having only one LDPC: the one that created it. But the points I was making on backlinking would not be affected by the possiblity of an LDPR having more than one ldp:contains relationship back. Btw in N3 there is a syntax for reverse linking If the LDPC one finds <> ldp:contains <joe> Then <joe> could contain in terms of backlink <> is ldp:contains of <.> which is equivalent of <.> ldp:contains <> . > > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 06:13:20 UTC