- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:55:57 -0400
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 18:56:24 UTC
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > hello all. > > after checking back with steve, it seems like a good idea to change > Accept-Post so that it uses the media type definition of HTTP's Accept, > instead of using the one of Accept-Patch. there is no difference for LDP, > but it makes Accept-Post more widely applicable. > > Accept-Patch only allows media types and no wildcards: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789#section-3.1 > > Accept allows media types and wildcards: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.1 > > we believe that aligning Accept-Post with HTTP's Accept is a better idea > than aligning it with Accept-Patch, and as mentioned above, there is no > impact on LDP. > It should pointed out too that Erik has some use cases for this beyond LDP that align closer to this model as well (AtomPub) as he points out in the draft. - Steve Speicher > > https://github.com/dret/I-D/tree/master/accept-post is where the > pre-publication draft lives, and i will update the current version to the > new model before submitting it next monday. > > cheers, > > dret. > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 18:56:24 UTC