Re: Some points in editor's draft that we might want to discuss our understandings of

On Jul 24, 2013, at 09:36 AM, Steve Speicher wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:52 AM, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 5.2.10 Some LDPC's have membership object's that are not directly URIs minted upon LDPC member creation,
>> [snip]
> 
> No action taken, due to lack of cycles.  Added to editor backlog/todo.

For  -- 

Just in case this is not obviated when the editor backlog is 
handled, I believe all three apostrophes now present in 5.2.10 
("LDPC's", "object's", "LDPC's") should be stripped.  None of 
these are possessives; all are plurals.

<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpc-5_2_10>


And since that got me searching for errant apostrophes...

"HTTP POST'd to the LDPC" 
--> "HTTP POSTed to the LDPC" 

in

1. <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpc-5_6_1>
2. <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpc-5_6_4>
3. <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpc-5_9_2>


Regards,

Ted


--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
         10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
     Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
     LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
     Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
     Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
     Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers