- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:41:43 -0500
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello david. On 2013-01-31 19:27 , "David Wood" <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: >On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:18, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group >Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data >>Platform core] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/48 >> >>Could this problem be addressed by simply requiring that LDP servers >>either advertise a list of vocabularies they support or a statement that >>any vocabularies are acceptable? could you say in a little more detail what you have in mind? advertising vocabularies on the web is done by advertising media types, which is what the original issue was about. if you refer to an RDF-specific mechanism of advertising vocabularies, then that may be unnecessary because the visibility issue is mostly about making LDP visible and discoverable on the web level, and not on the RDF level. cheers, dret.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 18:45:43 UTC