- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:59:55 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello henry. On 2013-01-31 12:43 , "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >LDPRs which can be any type of RDF groph. In RDF the type of the <> >document >can be infinite. It could be a foaf:Document, >foaf:PersonalProfileDocument, >ldp:Container, ldp:Resource, mony:ShoppingCart, ... >In atom there are only two types atom:Entry and atom:Feed. everything in atom is an entry or a feed, that's true. but similarly, everything in LDP is a container or an entry, or is that incorrect? assuming that this is indeed the fact, then we should represent that in the protocol. if not, then i am wondering how a client would be able to find entries when it gets, for example, the contents of a container and expects to be able to locate entries. >So given that application/atom+xml can only contain two subtypes >it is just about ok to put it in the mime/type of the header. but they don't need to be there. it's optional per the protocol. cheers, dret.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:06:01 UTC