Re: Proposal for containers

On 31 Jan 2013, at 13:52, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 1/31/13 6:17 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> This is clearly not currently in the spec we have now.
>> There is no way to define this clearly in RDF as is, though I suggest
>> a way to do it in the above mail.
> You can redefine our entire universe in RDF if you so choose. Such a definition is simply an expression of your world view via a graph representation of observation values.
> 
> The statement above is false.

Without the context the above snip you quote from me, means nothing, so
as such it has no truth value. Here is the original context:

[[
So I think we have worked out that a requirement for an AtomPub 
application of LDP is going to be a notion of profiles. Which I 
detailed here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0339.html

This is clearly not currently in the spec we have now. 
There is no way to define this clearly in RDF as is, though I suggest
a way to do it in the above mail.
]]

So I suppose you don't disagree with "It is currently not in the spec" 
part of the statement. The second part, can be better phrased. Here we go for
a second try:

[[
There is currently no well defined standard way of specifying profiles in rdf,
profiles being something along the lines of what I started outlining in the 
following mail entiteld "What are Profiles?" 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0339.html
]]

Do you disagree with that? If so pointers to well defined specs on that
would be appreciated.

Henry

> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/