W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:38:36 -0500
Message-Id: <6541263D-7C20-4817-9411-8D0FAB4E015E@3roundstones.com>
To: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Yes from me.  Good idea.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Jan 28, 2013, at 17:09, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/47
> 
> Raised by: Henry Story
> On product: 
> 
> We should publish the LDP ontology as linked data and also have an 
> Ontology product in the tracker.
> 
> The ontology should be published at <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp> 
> and can be as simple as this:
> 
> [[
> @prefix rdfs:    <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>.
> @prefix vs: <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#> .
> 
> <> rdfs:seeAlso <http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/> .
> 
> 
> ldp:Resource a rdf:Class;
>   rdfs:label "LDPR";
>   vs:term_status "unstable" .
> 
> 
> ldp:Container a rdf:Class;
>    rdfs:label "LDPC";
>    vs:term_status "unstable".
> 
> ldp:Container rdfs:subClassOf ldp:Resource .
> 
> ]]
> 
> If new terms appear they can be proposed to be added to the vocabulary/ontology.
> If restrictions appear to be useful they can be added there too. At least they can
> be proposed, discussed, and voted on.
> 
> When the spec is settled, more precise pointers to the spec for each item can
> be added where needed.
> 
> 
> 
> 



Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 22:39:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:44 UTC