- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:38:36 -0500
- To: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6541263D-7C20-4817-9411-8D0FAB4E015E@3roundstones.com>
Yes from me. Good idea. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On Jan 28, 2013, at 17:09, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology > > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/47 > > Raised by: Henry Story > On product: > > We should publish the LDP ontology as linked data and also have an > Ontology product in the tracker. > > The ontology should be published at <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp> > and can be as simple as this: > > [[ > @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>. > @prefix vs: <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#> . > > <> rdfs:seeAlso <http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/> . > > > ldp:Resource a rdf:Class; > rdfs:label "LDPR"; > vs:term_status "unstable" . > > > ldp:Container a rdf:Class; > rdfs:label "LDPC"; > vs:term_status "unstable". > > ldp:Container rdfs:subClassOf ldp:Resource . > > ]] > > If new terms appear they can be proposed to be added to the vocabulary/ontology. > If restrictions appear to be useful they can be added there too. At least they can > be proposed, discussed, and voted on. > > When the spec is settled, more precise pointers to the spec for each item can > be added where needed. > > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 22:39:04 UTC