- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:17:27 +0100
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 19:18:05 UTC
On 24 Jan 2013, at 20:04, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > > ... > > One could make the append rule more subtle for what I have > > called ldp:Content objects that I have talked about today: > > > > A POST of a graph containing the triple: > > > > <> a ldp:Container > > > > would create a new container resource. That seems > > quite plausible.... > > I have to admit not to understand why you want or need to introduce so many different classes. I'm no expert in defining ontologies so maybe it's just my lack of knowledge here but for what it's worth I don't see anything in the LDP spec as it stands which prevents this behavior. It's just silent about it. Which class am I ontroducing here? ldp:Container is part of the spec, and that's the only one mentioned in the text you quoted above. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 19:18:05 UTC