- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:34:25 +0100
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 15:35:11 UTC
Hi, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote: > > This seems to set us up to need a "Factory" predicate for any kind of > thing that can be created. Perhaps we could instead say way kind of > thing can be created in this container. > > For example, > > <> a ldp:Container; > ldp:canCreate ldp:Container, oslc:ChangeRequest . > > Then one could look up these Classes to see what they look like. This > may be something better for LDP 2.0 (for lack of better name). I have > a need for something like this anyway, knowing what kinds of things > the container accepts. Disclaimer, the name ldp:canCreate is nothing > I'm emotionally attached to. +1. This would be quite useful LDP servers bound to a domain model. Of course, it can be optional but it when it is present it provides clients some valuable information. Best Regards, Nandana
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 15:35:11 UTC