On 21 Jan 2013, at 15:58, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > On 2013-01-21 15:42 , "John Arwe" <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> that seems like something that's completely out of scope of the LDP >>> protocol. yes, there may be constraints on payload, but defining and >>> enforcing those should now be something LDP is concerned with. >> typo? was now or not the intent? >> It's a "somewhat plausible" read either way, although my instinct is that >> 'not' was the intent [LDP is/should not be concerned with validation]Best >> Regards, John > > indeed, a very bad typo. I switched off spelling correction yesterday. It was creating this type of error all the time. > > "there may be constraints on payload, but defining and enforcing those > should not be something LDP is concerned with." > > thanks for catching this! cheers, > > dret. > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 15:03:01 UTC