Re: issue-34 example

> that seems like something that's completely out of scope of the LDP
> protocol. yes, there may be constraints on payload, but defining and
> enforcing those should now be something LDP is concerned with.


typo?  was now or not the intent?
It's a "somewhat plausible" read either way, although my instinct is that 
'not' was the intent [LDP is/should not be concerned with validation]

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario