- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:15:50 -0800
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC73B9F44.95905487-ON88257AF7.0073AB42-88257AF7.0074CEF5@us.ibm.com>
> From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es> > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, > Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> > Date: 01/18/2013 10:58 AM > Subject: Re: issue-34 example > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com > > wrote: > POST, as it's simply additional triples: > > <Person/1> :friend <Person/4> . > > This follows from "Extending a database through an append > operation." (RFC 2616) > > (it would be valuable to be explicit that POST to LDP-R is add triples) > > +1. If that is the case, I think we should amend the 4.3 HTTP POST > [1] of the LDP spec to make it explicit. Reading the spec as it is > now, it is not clear whether it is allowed or what is the expected behavior. > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > [1] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#http-post > I agree the spec is silent as to what exactly happens when POSTing to a simple/non-LDPC LDPR and the spec should be changed if this is the desired behavior. I created Issue-45 for that purpose://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/45 This is separate from Issue-34 which Roger was talking about. I'm still not sure what Roger had in mind though. Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 21:17:26 UTC