- From: Bart van Leeuwen <Bart_van_Leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:16:26 +0100
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6E14A40C.6A63FDC0-ONC1257AF6.0069D30B-C1257AF6.0069E036@netage.nl>
> Hi John, > > I was just about to say something about the need to agree on a set > of terms we use consistently so I can only commend for you for > making such a proposal! :-) > > Now, given that: > 1) the current draft uses the term container > 2) per resolution of issue-25 at our F2F1 the spec is to be revised > to clarify that containers are about composition > > We really only need a term for the new type of container. So, I suggest: > 1) we use the term container when we mean to talk about composition, > strong composition, etc. > 2) we use the term aggregation when we want to talk about aggregation. :-) > 3) we stop referring to all other terms and variations involving > weak and strong > 4) if needed, we use the term collection as a higher level term to > refer to both types: containers and aggregations > > I see no problem with ending up with a spec that talks about > resources (LDPR), containers (LDPC), and aggregations (LDPA). > +1 Bart van Leeuwen
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 19:16:55 UTC