- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:25:00 -0500
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
hello all. On 2013-01-14 14:54 , "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >The argument is that instead of having containers >with URLs such as > http://example.org/container1 >they should be > http://example.org/container1/ picking one over the other is a preference of the entity managing container URIs and should be of no concern for the protocol (i.e., LDP implementations should have the freedom to go one way or the other). if there is any place in the protocol where the URI of a containers matters in any way, we've done something wrong. cheers, dret.
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 17:28:59 UTC