- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:03:03 -0700
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 17:05:06 UTC
Hi, To have more flexibility the RDF WG has its own local copy of ReSpec, including the biblio. Of course this has its own downside in that updates and improvements to ReSpec don't come for free - someone needs to refresh the local copy every now and then, but I have found it convenient to use. This may be something we should consider doing for the LDP WG. Best regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Date: 08/27/2013 10:28 PM Subject: Re-Spec references for LDP WG documents Hi, At the moment we have three references in biblio.json [1] with keys LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM, ldp, and ldp-ucr. Shall we 1. Unify LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM and ldp into one (using one as an alias) 2. Add references to the best practices guide, primer, and test cases document More concretely, following changes https://github.com/nandana/specref/commit/aad378fc37fb932985c6bb08b501b4dedd897c3a If that is ok, I can make a pull request to update biblio.json. Best Regards, Nandana [1] - https://raw.github.com/tobie/specref/master/biblio.json
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 17:05:06 UTC