Hi Ashok,
I think most people will be in vacations during August so if it is better
may be we can shift the dates a bit. Probably we can discuss in today's
call.
Best Regards,
Nandana
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote:
> Hi Nandana:
> Those dates are a bit tight. If everyone else is ok with them I will read
> the spec on the beach :-)
> All the best, Ashok
> On 8/4/2013 6:03 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Roger and I have been working on moving the examples we had in the wiki
> to ReSpec format and doing the changes to comply with the latest changes to
> the spec after the F2F3. We are halfway through [1].
>
> We still miss some examples and need like two more weeks complete the
> examples and polish the text a bit. After that we will be ready for a
> review from the WG and then go for the FPWD. We already have two action
> items ACTION-70 and ACTION-71 for Ashok and Henry for reviewing the primer.
>
> So if we follow a similar plan to UCR FPWD:
>
> 19.08.2013: Editor's draft is frozen for review by the WG; the WG has
> two weeks to raise issues against it.
> 02.09.2013: Deadline for raising issues as input for the editors; the WG
> has two weeks to dispose of the raised issues
> 09.09.2013: Editor as one week to annotate the draft with the open issues.
> F2F4: WG to decide go/no-go on publication of FPWD
>
> We will have to check with Ashok and Henry if these days works for them
> for the review. If they are ok, will the above timeline work ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
> [1] -
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/tip/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html
>
>